Anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies are not babies who are the next "Qualcomm"
The Qualcomm case shows the game between China and Europe and the United States in the field of intellectual property. Chinese officials responded that the Chinese anti-monopoly law enforcement agency is not a baby. “Some American colleagues asked me that China’s current anti-monopoly law enforcement agency is still a baby. It’s fine to eat rice porridge. How can I eat steak?†This is the information disclosed by Liu Jian, deputy director of the Price Development Bureau of the National Development and Reform Commission, after attending a seminar after the announcement of the Qualcomm anti-monopoly ticket. In the opinion of analysts, “steak†refers to the complicated case of “Qualcomm Case†which is at the forefront of the world. Liu Jian’s response is why the Chinese institution cannot be regarded as a thriving teenager. At present, Qualcomm has received an administrative penalty decision of 6.008 billion yuan for more than three months. But this anti-monopoly punishment did not end there. Due to the final punishment of the Qualcomm case, a model open conclusion was given. Therefore, the final establishment of the law enforcement rules requires a series of related similar cases and specific action guidelines. This involves the overall policy orientation of a country's future, namely how to choose a balance between protecting innovation and combating monopoly. From a higher level, one of the economic principles of anti-monopoly is game theory. In addition to the game between enterprises, the industry and national interests reflected in the global value chain are another dimension of the game. At the end of March, US Presidential Special Representative and Finance Minister Jacob Lew visited Chinese Premier Li Keqiang and talked about the orientation of China's overall (communication) market after the Qualcomm investigation. Before and after this, the Chinese law enforcement team members who participated in the case also encountered intensive questions from American and European counterparts at international conferences such as Washington and Geneva. In the future, how should China's anti-monopoly law enforcement in the field of intellectual property-intensive areas be chosen? Behind the confrontation, both China and the United States are rushing to develop anti-monopoly action guidelines in the field of intellectual property. Who will be the next "Qualcomm"? It is a suspense that is nearing and waiting to be solved. "Qualcomm-like" litigation and reporting In February of this year, the National Development and Reform Commission dealt with the unilateral behavior of Qualcomm's abuse of market dominance to exclude and restrict competition, and ordered Qualcomm to stop related illegal activities. The fine of 8% in sales in China in 2013 was 6.088 billion yuan. When the ticket was issued, the entire industry shook. The domino effect of the Qualcomm case began to appear. First and foremost, quite a number of "Qualcomm-like" lawsuits and reports began to be put on the agenda. In the process of waiting for the boots to land, the author learned from more than ten industry sources that the whole industry has begun to set off an anti-monopoly report. Among them, quite a few mainstream law firms feel anti-monopoly compliance, report and respond to the obvious increase in the volume of business review; in the same period, there are intellectual property litigation. On March 21 this year, Zhang Handong, director of the Price Development Supervision Bureau of the National Development and Reform Commission, said at the internal seminar held by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences that anti-monopoly regulation on the abuse of intellectual property rights, different countries, and different periods of the country will With different choices, China needs to strengthen anti-monopoly enforcement of intellectual property abuse while emphasizing intellectual property protection. This means that the “Qualcomm-like†case is still the focus of the Chinese anti-monopoly law enforcement department in the future. A large number of reports or litigation cases, in addition to being encouraged by a large number of tickets, is also in response to the aftermath of the "Qualcomm case." In the “post-Qualcomm eraâ€, there may be more non-products, patent-only non-implementing entities (Non-PracticingEntity), entering the market and collecting license fees. If there is a skyrocketing price, it may also have an adverse impact on the entire industry chain. "First Financial Daily" previously reported that in a non-public occasion, a Huawei executive said that the licensing fee is the most difficult thing for the implementer, because there are often a number of rights holders in a standard to find Chinese manufacturers to charge. Huawei uses a standard for communication equipment or mobile phones. There are 5 to 10 necessary patent holders in the standard. When everyone comes to Huawei, they say "I want your sales to be 1% to 5%", even the highest. It takes 7%. If there are 10 people, 50% of the product sales may be taken away. "These rights holders should mainly refer to Qualcomm or a company similar to the Qualcomm model," said a person close to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. Huawei will not be the only mobile phone company that has encountered such a situation. The insiders revealed to the author that mobile phone companies that have market influence, such as BBK, Meizu, and Xiaomi, may be attacked by some patent holders who do not use mobile phones. In the long run, the “Qualcomm case†will also affect the expectations of Ericsson and Nokia to claim patent fees from Chinese manufacturers in mainland China or overseas. For example, Ericsson sued Xiaomi in India, and Nokia, which no longer produces mobile phones, is more motivated. Royalties. These new problems and problems will be the focus of the next step of law enforcement. Who will be the next Qualcomm will also need to wait and see. The latest news is that in the anti-monopoly law enforcement in the field of intellectual property, China has put a unified rule guide into the agenda. Butt Plugs,Vibrator Butt Plug Anus Sex Toy,Sex Butt Plug,Butt Plug For Women Shenzhen Dongchen Hey E-commerce Co.,Ltd. , https://www.xxsexytoy.com